Cricket World Cup Betting Odds | Oddschecker
- Cricket World Cup Betting Odds | Oddschecker
- World T20 Cup 2020 Betting | Best Odds on Top Betting Sites
- ICC T20 World Cup 2020 Cricket Betting Odds & Lines
- Women's T20 World Cup: England v South Africa - Live - BBC
- Best Twenty20 Betting 2020 - Find T20 Betting Odds Here
Cricket Betting Sites - Best Online Gambling Sites (Updated ...|Betbarter.net
submitted by BetBarter to u/BetBarter [link] [comments]
Previous few years has changed a lot of things in the betting market, as well as these adjustments are done for the betterment! In case you are searching for the very best online cricket betting sites
in India, Betbarter
is below to help you. We're going to disclose some insight into the best wagering websites that recognize Indian customers, and we're additionally going to disentangle the puzzle behind the authorized part of sports betting in one of the most thickly booming internet wagering markets!
Cricket is the preferred sporting activities of people of India, and also you can locate significant followers of cricket throughout the nation. This enthusiasm of Indian fans towards cricket has actually offered the space for the on the internet betting market
. Indian online betting sites
for sporting activities have actually tended to provide bets for major cricket tournaments like Indian Premier League and also quick n angry T20 World Cups , betting on cricket has actually genuinely removed, with punters supplying a grand extent of wagering possibilities.
Just as the Indian top picks, you would now be able to uncover coordinate wagers for the Indian IPL, the Pakistani Super League and all the top worldwide and also world cricket competitions. Continue reading underneath to locate the most effective cricket wagering sites
as well as find where to get the very best rewards, advancements, possibilities costs as well as live streams.
Which are some of the very best sites for cricket wagering?
- LeoVegas Sporting activity
These websites master their respective locations, and also users can bet with a peace of mind of having a substantial payment. Furthermore, the top bookies Mentioned above have demonstrated to provide affordable probabilities which are hard to discover, specifically not by some since lately entered on the internet sportsbooks
Is on the internet sports wagering legal in India?
If you are lucky adequate to look for the response to this question over the internet, you will locate lots of opposing declarations leading you to uncertainties.
Something lacks a question; no law is implemented in India that might in any capability, put your possibility or flexibility at risk. To make matters amazingly better, the specialists have made a move to a training course which matches both you and also any type of prepared online wagering website that needs to develop procedures in India. Therefore, web wagering in India is a point; nevertheless, the legal standing is still obscure.
The interesting point we can tell you regarding online betting in India is that you can easily bet online, and also there are several alternatives to select from. Aside from that, you can make secure deposits and also withdrawals from your betting account without being fretted about the validity of the process.
As you can see that each wagering internet site
differs in performing betting procedures and also some generally offer a betting offer for a selected variety of games. Nowadays, with the rise of T-20 cricket during the most current 10 years has actually prompted numerous brand-new cricket competitions and also tournaments being established. And also wagering sites have made a considerable effort to take care of the new passion as well as guaranteed they use a vast selection of departments from around the globe.
The bookmakers  that we have enlisted have offered complete protection of nearly all the cricket events to get you the very best from on-line betting
Live Cricket Betting
Cricket is the sort of video game that goes connected at the hip with in-play betting. Whether you're banking on a standard 5-day examination suit or a T-20 match from the Indian IPL, you'll have the alternative to locate a whole extent of invigorating online bets that integrate batsman markets, run markets, the first man out, next male out, following means of termination as well as a lot more.
Promotions and Special Reward uses for cricket are prevalent amongst the wagering sites
enlisted on our page. You will not be able to find the promotions that a year-long, however you will definitely locate something remarkable when the period starts. Frequently there is a great range of wagering refund offers or incentive earning account creation (to bring in new consumer), occasional totally free bet bargains as well as price boosts.
With considering each of the attributes from all the web sites, we think that Betbarter
is the best driver for cricket wagering and also promos. Added to the welcome incentive for new customers, you will certainly find numerous worth-while offers that have been uncommonly developed to run close by the most renowned competitions.
Various other top bookmakers include Betway, that offer a phenomenal range of each day cost increase. For an increasingly full rundown of the various types of new offers that are readily available to any individual at the bookmakers, you can examine our blog sites as well as get detailed content.In case of inquiries or inquiries regarding on-line betting, you can consult our on the internet client support.
All crucial aspects you want to know about cricket
submitted by MATCHPREDICTION123 to u/MATCHPREDICTION123 [link] [comments]
Cricket Betting in India is to a great degree well known the nation over. Cricket has a since quite a while ago settled history in India dating the distance back to the 1700's. It is a standout amongst the most betting on sports in India alongside football and tennis. While there are no official sites from India to put down Cricket Tips
on, there are numerous trusted European betting destinations that acknowledge bettings from Indian occupants. Some even acknowledge rupees straightforwardly. Underneath you will locate the best Satta locales for Cricket Betting Tips
India, a timetable for household competitions, and some cricket betting tips. You will discover more detail on the different subjects on devoted pages.Live Cricket Betting – In Match Betting
Cricket Live is once in a while alluded to as 'in-coordinate', 'in-play' or 'in-running' betting which enables betters to put down bettings amid a live match as the amusement progresses. For instance, rather than simply betting on the last score or result of the cricket coordinate, bettors can betting how the following expulsion will happen, what number of runs a group will score on the following ball or the following man out. This is accessible internet betting locales through live stream innovation that enables players to view and betting on the match continuously. This adds a level of fervor to the amusement that isn't accessible through conventional 'static' cricket. Having a strong web association makes this strategy considerably more pleasant as it diminishes the slack between the constant occasion and gathering of the occasion. Live betting is quickly passed and requires that the keeps up add up to center to monitor the match as it advances and the chances offered on each betting. Since the betting constant, bettors should rapidly act to make a portion of the bettings continuously.Information about Cricket in India
As we specified previously, India has a long and rich history in the game of Cricket Tips Free
. From its presentation in 1721 by British sailors to the principal known club, The Calcutta Cricket and Football Club framing in 1792, and a glad heritage of global occasions and competitions, India is known as a noteworthy power in the game. It's fervor as a Match Tips
occasion is difficult to coordinate. This is in no little part because of the enthusiastic connection and feeling of pride that Indians have with the game.Domestic Cricket Tournaments of IndiaNKP Salve Challenger Trophy [October before the beginning of Ranji Season]:
Started in 1994 by the BCCI. Named after N.K.P. Balm. Played before the start of the Ranji Trophy. Played between 3 groups India Seniors (India Blue), India An (India Red) and India B (India Green).Duleep Trophy [October]:
Named after Kumar Shri Duleepsinhji. Started in 1961 by the BCCI. Highlights groups from various districts of India (North, South, Central, East, West).Ranji Trophy [October – February]:
Named after Kumar Shri Ranjitsinhji and the first of the sorted out trophy competitions in 1934, it is viewed as the head competition for Cricket in India.Irani Cup/Trophy [After Ranji Trophy]:
Named after Sal Irani. Started in 1949. The container used to be played toward the start of the season to check the beginning of the new local season. Highlights the victors of the Ranji Trophy and the Rest of India Team.BCCI Raj Corporate Trophy [After Ranji Final]:
Started in 2009 and made by the Board of Control for Cricket in India. 12 groups, 50 over agree with corporate groups. Typically plays the start of the cricket season in September, however, in 2012-2013 season it will play after the Ranji Final.Vijay Hazare Trophy [End of Season]:
Named after Vijay Hazare. Started in 2002 and made out of groups from the Ranji Trophy plates.Deodhar Trophy [End of Season]:
Named after D.B. Deohar. Started in 1973. 50-over knockout competition played by 5 territorial groups of India (North, South, Central, East, West).Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy [End of Season]:
Named after Syed Mushtaq Ali. Started in 2008 by the BCCI. T20 frame competition.Indian Premier League (IPL) [April-May]:
Began in 2008 by the BCCI. T20 arrange. It is a standout amongst the most mainstream and gainful competitions. Esteemed at $4 Billion starting 2012. Normal player pay is $4 million. Indian Cricket Team
The national Indian Cricket Team takes part in universal ODI, Test and T20 occasions. India has demonstrated some accomplishment all through their history on the universal stage. The 80's and mid 90's were a solid period for the Indian national group, winning the Cricket World Cup (1983), Asia Cup (1984, 1988, 1990, 1995), World Championship of Cricket (1985). Subsequent to hitting a droop amid the 90's including a touch of embarrassment, the Indian Cricket Team has turned out with some solid showings in universal occasions, beginning with third place in the Asia Cup in 2000, at that point joint champions of the ICC Champions Trophy in 2002, sprinters up in the Asia Cup in 2004 and 2008, Champions of the Asia Cup in 2010 and a third-place complete in 2012. Their present standings are fifth (Test), first (ODI) and third (T20). The Indian Cricket Team is by all accounts in another period of cricket.Cricket Betting Tips and StrategyDistinctive sorts of bettors:
There are distinctive kinds of bettors out there. Some are searching only for the excite of the betting. They will Cricket Free Tips
on everything without exception, they are fundamentally searching for excitement. Some basically betting on their most loved group, multiplying down on their sense of duty regarding their group and adding fervor to the result of the match. Some play revenue driven, they are watchful just excessively search for good esteems; to them, the procedure is to a greater degree a science than a craftsmanship. Recognize what sort of CBTF Cricket
you are and play in like manner.Betting for the Thrill:
In the event that you are seeking Cricket Match Tips
for the . Investigate recommendation and outlandish. These enable you to bet on a wide range of occasions and results. This incorporates occasion swarm estimate, odd or even scores, wickets for singular bowlers and that's only the tip of the iceberg. They add a level of energy to the diversion that straightforward match bettings don't offer. They have a more elevated amount of hazard, yet that is a piece of the good times!Playing for Value:
On the off chance that you are playing for esteem, take it. Take a gander at each betting as a venture. Making cash over the long haul is to make Cricket Match Betting Tips
on positive, where the betting destinations have underestimated certain results. Stick to more regular bettings, fundamentally the match victor. Along these lines has a tendency to be less energizing in light of the fact that to take it genuine you need to confer a really long time every occasion to decide esteem.The Pitch:
States of the pitch from to stadium change. The distinction can have a critical effect how the amusement is played and how different players.The Venue:
Consider or away as groups regularly better when they have a steady behind them. Research to see past execution in the stadium of the distinctive groups if this history is accessible.Keep in mind the Weather:
Like in different games, wet amusements tend to deliver bring down scores, while better conditions will give Cricket Match Tips
scoring openings. This additionally incorporates wind speed and heading and in addition day or night recreations. Make a point to check the propensities of the groups playing in different conditions. Do they play well specifically conditions versus their adversaries? Cricket Betting Tips:
Get profitable cricket and predictions with Cricket Betting Tips Free. We provide long-term profitable Cricket Betting Tips with full transparency. On Cricket Betting Tips Free
you will get latest cricket With our Cricket Betting Tips, you can earn more money and can make profits.
#cricketbettingtipsfree #cricketprediction #matchprediction #todaymatchprediction #todaycrickettips #todaymatchtips #matchtips
Do we really want 300+ run fests in the World Cup? I know I don't
T20 has been criticised by the likes of Windies legendary bowler, Michael Holding, for requiring too little strategy from batsmen as nearly everything is in their favour (massive bats, short boundaries, fielding restrictions, free hits etc). I don't fully agree with him but that's besides the point of this post. He is unsurprisingly a big fan of test cricket (as I would assume most of this sub is), because it's a test for both bowlers and batsmen. Test conditions usually have something in it for both disciplines and is therefore a more balanced contest between bat and ball. But surprisingly, he (Holding) recently made the comment that ODI's need good batting wickets - "the ball shouldn't go off the straight, a bit of swing through the air is fine, but batsmen should be able to play through the line and trust the bounce", were his approximate words. And it's not just Holding, many other commentators have said that a 300+ wicket is a "good cricket wicket". And I just don't agree - I know that the ICC thinks that the general public just want fours and sixes - but that doesn't constitute a "good wicket" (and it's not necessarily more entertaining). A good ODI wicket (imo) is one that still offers a something for nearly all disciplines - similar to a good test wicket. It's strange to hear that one of the biggest critics of the t20 game (Holding), doesn't mind one-sided ODI conditions. And once again, it's not just him - it's a sentiment that I get from nearly all commentators. submitted by _Born_Under_Punches to Cricket [link] [comments]
I understand the challenge for groundsmen - especially for something like the World Cup - they obviously have to prepare entertaining wickets, so their safest bet is to prepare batting roads. But a more balanced wicket could be just as entertaining, even for the general public - people get excited when a fast bowler gets crazy eyes and makes the batsmen's life a living hell. Or when a mystery spinner bamboozles world class players with insane variations. Plus lower scoring games are almost always closer - winning margins become smaller - which keeps crowds interested for longer. So I don't think you pull in crowds by more sixes and fours - you do so by producing more competitive/closer matches.
Now the challenge comes in actually preparing these wickets - for the WC they have to last for the tournament - so it would be pretty stupid to prepare spinner dustbowls for game one - but what about leaving some extra live grass on the pitch? Wouldn't that spice the wicket up with some extra seam and pace and bounce? And as the tournament progresses the pitches would slow down and offer less to pace bowlers and more to spinners - but that's exactly what you want - variation in conditions. Which means that teams would have to vary winning strategies.
My last question is, why are they happy with the white Kookaburra? The fact that they need a new one from each side has killed reverse swing. If they were to use one pink ball for the full 50 overs, then it would spice up the middle/death overs by giving something for fast bowlers to work with. It would be way more interesting to see attempted death hitting when the ball is tailing around - only the best batsmen would succeed - and isn't that more entertaining that watching less talented players tonk the ball around like it's a joke?
So TLDR: 300 plus roads doesn't necessarily translate to good cricket, by balancing conditions it could become more exciting, even for casual fans, as lower scoring games also tend to be a bit closer - which is perfect for the World Cup. I really hope we don't end up getting innings that look like extended t20 highlights.
PGA: No Frills DFS Data - Honda Classic Recap & Discussion of Golf Metrics
https://rotogrinders.com/blog-posts/pga-no-frills-dfs-data-honda-classic-recap-discussion-of-golf-metrics-2945909 submitted by DFSx42 to dfsports [link] [comments]
So, this slate was fantastic.
I had a player pool of 22 guys and only 3 missed the cut with another as an MDF. While I only had 1 guy in the top 5 this time, it was one of my most exposed players in Lucas Glover. I had 3 more at T9 so 4 of the top 11 guys and a bunch more T20 or better. I didn't have any lineups packed with the top 5 so didn't have any huge individual scores but when most lineups went 6/6 or 5/6 with a bunch of T20 or better players, it's always going to be a very good week despite not hitting yahtzee.
Again, to recap, here was my player pool in order of exposure.
T30 Justin Thomas
T4 Lucas Glover
MDF Graeme McDowell
T9 Sergio Garcia
T59 Zach Johnson
T36 Daniel Berger
T16 Michael Thompson
T59 Vaughn Taylor
T36 Gary Woodland
T51 Russell Knox
CUT Adam Scott
T20 Chesson Hadley
CUT Luke List
T16 Billy Horschel
T20 Brian Stuard
T36 Byeong Hun An
CUT Cameron Smith
T36 J.T. Poston
T9 Jason Kokrak
T9 Jim Furyk
T20 Matt Wallace
T20 Talor Gooch
My model once again pushed Furyk (it tends to really like him, Chez Reavie and Phil Michelson) but this time it wasn't overboard about it. At the end I didn't use him in any of the purely model driven lines but ended up trusting the model when I created the "homer line" where I choose 1-2 guys I really want added in and exclude a few I'm already heavy on so I could jam in Adam Scott again and the lineup said fill it out with Furyk. Was pleasantly surprised with a T9 from the guy and it will give me a little bit more faith when the model recommends him.
Now back to Adam Scott, this is why I limit my ability to directly construct a lineup to only 1 dart. The only things in Scott's favor were course history, tout coverage and Vegas odds. Everything else said he's a fine golfer but way too overpriced and since my model works rather holistically, all those things were already accounted for so I already had a smittering of him out there. Yet I bought into the narrative and jammed him in there. I don't regret the decision, I'd do it again. But this is exactly why I build a model, because if I built my 10x gpp lineups by hand, I'd likely have gone with him in a lot more lineups because his narrative was very compelling. The other guys to miss the cut in Smith and List, well, I stand by those choices as well. Half the field needs to be cut, so even if everyone golfed the game of their lives you'd still get half the field get cut despite hitting peak form. Kind of like if everyone went to an Ivy League then we'd have Yale PhDs flipping burgers kind of scenario. In short, don't worry about it. Even the best golfers will miss the cut.
You may also recall the model was suggesting Ortiz and Blayne and I vetoed them because I didn't feel the data was reliable. They both missed the cut. I would have been about 1/3 exposed to each had I not manually sifted through and error checked my lineups, something I sometimes don't get a chance to do because I didn't start running the model until near lock. It would have been disastrous had I not seen those unfamiliar names and decided to take a closer look.
My cash games went exceedingly well as I chose one of my lineups that did fairly well to use in cash. I cashed in every 50/50 and double up (sometimes outright winning them) and won all but 2 of my h2hs. There's a good story here about why, despite that I play most of my volume in cash, that I go with only 1 lineup. There's one specific player I've been matching up with quite a bit. It started out in lower stakes and I believe he's now tilted and trying to recover because he keeps upping the stakes but I keep taking em. This past slate he posted a $100 h2h and I took it. He then matched up with me in another one for $5. He decided to go with 2 lineups, one of them performed pretty poorly, another would have done very well in a GPP. Given how pleased I am writing about this, I bet you can imagine which one of those I lost and which I won. This is why I just create one cash lineup and stick with it because I've been on his side of things in the past. If he wins both then it wouldn't matter, if he loses both then it wouldn't matter. If he loses the $5 wins the $100 it doesn't matter... but if he loses the $100 but wins the $5 then he goes on crazy monkey tilt.
It doesn't matter at all that mathematically speaking it doesn't make a difference (so long as both lineups had equal assumed expectations), emotions still run high in this and unless you're doing very high volume at leveled stakes (not 2 matchups of 20x difference in size) and not going to track the individual results but look at the big picture then it's fine. But nobody does this, we aren't androids, when you win you win, when you lose you lose. This is why although I put way more in cash than gpp and bad cash lineup can sink me, I'm still taking a binary approach with cash games. I'm not taking a 75% indifference with a 25% chance of losing my god damn mind because the h2h that mattered was the one that failed. Fail like a stoic with a single cash lineup that gives 100% indifference.
Now then, some people have been asking me to go into more detail about about the data that use to create the lineups. I'll just reiterate again that I'm never going to explain how the sausage is made. But I will be serving plenty of sausage and give you a general idea what animal it came from.
Today I'm going to talk about specifically how most of my research really demonstrates just how stupid most golf stats are. I really want to be 100% sure and am in the process of scraping an absurdly large database containing several decades. And since I'm doing this on my free time, it'll take some time before I parse and analyze everything. I don't want to make the very bold claims I already believe to true without further studying the matter and really ensuring my thoughts are real and it's not the product of bad calculations or insufficient sample size. But, what I've discovered thus far, is that all those stats are just window dressing. Saying someone led the field shots gained x is fundamentally no different than saying "they did well and had a good tournament." Things like shots gained track results not process. So it's much like tracking wins and rbis. Yes, the best hitters and the best pitchers in baseball often lead the league in those metrics, but we all know why they aren't good predictive tools.
For example, when my beloved Red Sox signed Dante Bichette in 2001, there was all this talk about him having led the major leagues in RBIs the past few seasons. He just had his epic year, two years ago driving in 133 runs and the year before got 90. While he was aging and slowing down, I distinctly remember a lot confusion over why we signed this elite hitter but then used him in a platoon. I'd be at Fenway and as the Red Sox lost, people would openly question the wisdom of having one of the best hitters in the game ride it out on the bench. This was 2 years before Moneyball was published and while front offices knew the reality of the situation (third team in 2 years and out of the league after that season), the average hard core Red Sox fan would just scratch their head wondering why we didn't give Dante a little more of a chance to show he still had it.
I feel this is the situation today with golf and golf statistics while what we have today is an improvement of the past - we take it for granted that it comes with the same authority as so wOBA or usage. We know that the winners won, but we don't know much else and shots gained is basically more or less a fancy way to say someone did a better job. If someone gets a birdie on a par 4, their SG will improve by about... drumroll please... 1. So you could just simply compare scores - IE look at end of tournament standings. Yes, there is definitely some nuance and they do factor in the relative difficulty of that specific par 4 and if I didn't feel like there was some actionable data out there I wouldn't bother with any of this. But I believe that way too much weight is put into this, whether I'm right or wrong, I will follow up on this in much more detail once it's no longer a hunch but rather indisputable. The reason why gathering this data is difficult is that it's restricted - which itself should be a bit of a red flag.
I'll also be reading "Every Shot Counts" soon, which is a book written by the creator of the Shots Gained metric. I really don't want to make any further and sweeping judgements until I read the author's long and detailed explanation of the metric.
But really, we can all see the smoking gun https://registrations.pgatourhq.com/forms/shotlinkintel/
for ourselves to see that the process by which they used to record shots gained is kept a secret and they don't disclose the data. Even prior to them ghosting us, access to the statistics themselves was restricted - you need to apply for access. The twitter account still exists and it's like everyone vanished into thin air, the last tweet https://twitter.com/ShotLink/status/893531791297978368
was well over a year ago and simply a picture of a golf course as if nothing was about the change.
Also, the PGA still insists "All strokes gained statistics are calculated using ShotLink, the PGA TOUR's real-time scoring system powered by CDW. https://www.pgatour.com/news/2016/05/31/strokes-gained-defined.html
But since it's so secretive, we really don't know much about it. I'm not talking conspiracies or anything, they could have a very good data collection system that's phenomenal, but the very notion that the PGA doesn't even bother telling anyone how the data is collected and yet nobody is asking any questions should tell you this isn't exactly the most objective market.
So basically, I'm very confused by Shots Gained as a metric, can find very little information on it and what I can find is out of date and contradictory and seems to imply it's more or less no different than a nuanced version of looking at the final standings. I want to say it's bullshit, but I'm just reserving final judgement and simply labeling as sketchy for now.
So then we should look at results yeah? Yes, but this is largely what pricing is based upon, so not much of an edge there. So shall we look at ranking? Yes, let's take a look at OWGR.
When I first started with golf, I knew nothing and had nothing to base anything on other than seeing their pricing and recent point accumulations. Since Tiger Woods wasn't playing in that event, it was all entirely new names, just names I'd hear in passing while switching off ESPN as they were starting their golf coverage. So naturally, when I saw each golfer had a world ranking, I viewed that as a cheat sheet. From the very beginning, one of the formulas I've used to develop lineups was as simple as putting together the golfers within budget that collectively had the lowest aggregate world ranking number. Why am I suddenly speaking in such specifics you ask? Because it's a horrible DFS metric and nobody else is doing it (I track gpps lineups to see what others are doing, there are a few of these more simple formulas that pop up periodically, this is not one of them) so it's not exactly as if disclosing this information will make my opponents that much stronger.
My OWGR lineup has in fact been the single worst performing in cash and the 2nd to worst performing in gpps of the dozens of lineup models I have. Thankfully, I don't play it because it's so bad but I keep tracking it and recording how it would have performed just for fun these days. The only lineup that performed worse than the OWGR lineup in GPPS, well that one heavily factors in OWGR as well :). OWGR is just a terrible, terrible metric for DFS. Yes, it will give you the cream of the crop like the Dustin Johnsons, but you can never afford a lineup of Dustin Johnsons, you'll have to start digging deeper and pulling up min priced guys like Satoshi Kodaira - mr bitcoin himself. Someone who if you've been reading my stuff, is the entire reason I stopped playing any lineup that had OWGR as a primary indicator.
Now Satoshi, despite being a pretty horrible DFS play most of the time, is a great example of everything wrong with OWGR. His Fedex Cup rank is currently 160 and has never been better than 93, but his world rank is perplexingly 59. In 2018, he played 18 tournaments and finished under par only twice. He missed more cuts than he made as well. I could be mistaken, but it seems that he got into some majors via a sponsor in 2017 and 2018 and managed to do alright in them. He also ended up winning one of the tournaments he played in last year.
When researching OWGR to figure out how it came about and how it is calculated, I learned a lot. Basically, it's nothing more than party planning. A golf course in Scotland wanted to figure out whom to invite to compete in their tournament and invented the system. It weighs the strength of the field very heavily in rewarding points- and the strength of the field is - yup - you guessed it - determined by people already ranked by the system. So if Dustin Johnson cloned himself and kept playing tournaments exclusive to him and his equally ranked clones, they'd forever hold onto the top rankings. If OWGR was an excel sheet, the creator would get an error popup upon loading it up each day due to circular references. So, Satoshi I'm sure is a great golfer, anyone there should be, but his ranking is very artificially skewered up because he managed to make the cut and finish around 50th in some really packed majors that had a lot of heavy hitters. In fact, the ranking system is so completely absurd, that any millionaire can get themselves world ranked pretty easily. They just need to do something like sponsor a Pro-Am at some odd but counted tour like the Alps Tour and then invite the guys ranked 1st, 2nd and 3rd to compete and filling out the rest of the field with toddlers and yourself. You would be assured a 4th place finish. Yet you didn't beat any of the top 3 golfers in the world. You just beat 100 toddlers. Yet you still get the high ranking because they get 45, 37 and 32 respective points for strength of field, which is greater than if you had a tournament of the golfers ranked 93rd through 200 playing. Finishing 4th behind the only 3 adults and beating 100 toddlers has the same impact as finishing 4th in a field of 107 of the greatest golfers in the world. http://www.owgr.com/about
Finishing 4th and beating 100 toddlers will grant you the same amount of points as finishing 20th at a major. That's how utterly stupid this rating system is. Obviously I'm using some extreme edge cases, it's very likely they would see through that scheme and not count it, but you get the idea of how inconsistent the system is. If you simply altered the PGA tour to the top 3 golfers and then a bunch of amateurs, those amateurs would soon arbitrarily be some of the highest rated in the world themselves, thus feeding itself.
This is why I call my OWGR model Ouroboros https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros
Dustin Johnson doesn't play defense. He isn't jumping out of the sand trap and blocking your approach shot. Him finishing in front of you has zero impact on how well you performed compared to him. Yet if you simply show up and play in enough events where he easily beats you, you'll end up with a solid world ranking. This is an absurd system. When I researched OWGR, I was simply shocked it was how some random guy created an invitation list for a tournament and because golf feels the need to be so full of tradition they just made that the official world rankings.
Don't get me wrong, the top OWGR guys are all very good DFS plays because they are winners. However, after a certain point you're not dealing with anything at all reliable. I'm not sure at which point it gets diluted, but after a certain point, that metric becomes just as unstable as Bitcoin. I find it very amusing that the indicator that showed me the flaws with OWGR after a certain stage is named Satoshi. I'm also fully aware of how difficult it is to quantify something so intangible as golf. However, there's no doubt in my mind that there must be a significantly better manner than what is currently used.
But, whether or not my hunch is right or wrong, we still have a system where the data is all secretly gathered and stored by the PGA. That's something everyone should be aware of as they set their lineups.
Good luck everyone. Will dive deeper into the shots gained after I get around to buying and reading the book and finally finish analyzing that data. I could very well come back here in two weeks apologizing for my ignorance that gave me the gall to question such genius. In the meantime, good luck grinding out there and I'll post again in a few days with my player pool for the next event.
Sri Lanka's limited overs record over the last 12 years and the Windies' two unlikely triumphs
submitted by ehloelle to Cricket [link] [comments]
Every Sri Lankan who watched last Sunday's final would have been thinking that their team must be paying for sins of a past life. In their head, they must have reasoned that losing 4 on the trot was far too many and surely would not occur. Alas, but to the great delight of this jovial set of calypso islanders, Sri Lanka's dream was not realised.
Since their 1996 World Cup victory, Sri Lanka have acquired a reputation as a lively, exciting and combative limited overs side, capable of competing on an even keel with the very best. In the last 12 years, they have qualified for 17 finals and 2 semifinals. The appearances are as follows:
1) Asia Cup 2000 Final (vs. Pakistan) Host: BAN
2) Singer Triangular 2000 Winner (vs South Africa) Host: SRI
3) ARY Gold Cup 2001 Winner (vs. Pakistan) Host: UAE
4) Morocco Cup 2002 Winner (vs. South Africa) Host: MOROCCO
5) Champions Trophy 2002 Shared Winner(vs India) Host: SRI
6) World Cup 2003 Semi (vs. Australia) Host: SA
7) Asia Cup 2004 Winner (vs. India) Host: SRI
8) Paktel Cup 2004 Winner (vs. Pakistan) Host: PAK
9) Indian Oil Cup 2005 Winner (vs. India) Host: SRI
10)VB Series 2006 Final (vs. Australia) Host: AUS
11)World Cup 2007 Final (vs. Australia) Host: WI
12)Asia Cup 2008 Winner (vs. India) Host: PAK
13)T20 World Cup 2009 Final (vs. Pakistan) Host: ENG
14)Idea Cup 2010 Winner (vs. India) Host: BAN
15)T20 World Cup 2010 Semi (vs. England) Host: WI
16)Asia Cup 2010 Final (vs. India) Host: SRI
17)World Cup 2011 Final (vs. India) Host: IND/SRI/BAN
18)CB Series 2012 Final (vs. Australia) Host: AUS
19)T20 World Cup 2012 Final (vs. AUS/WI) Host: SRI
Winners: 8 Runners-up: 9 Semi-Finalist: 2
What can be deduced is that a lot of these tournaments have been held in Asia where Sri Lanka of course thrive and where tournament organisers would hope that Sri Lankan fans would turn up in their numbers. However, exceptional performances in challenging conditions like in South Africa in 2003, England in 2009 and Australia in 2012 must not be ignored.
The failure to clear the last hurdle has created an almost psychological block for most Sri Lankan fans. However, the consistency in reaching 4 finals in 4 years must be applauded and Sri Lankan fans will come to appreciate it once the heartache soothes with time. Windies' two unlikely triumphs
At exactly the halfway stage of the West Indian innings, you would not have found too many punters lining up at the betting shops and backing the men in maroon. 32-2, 10 overs read the score card. Mathews, Kulesekera and Mendis were asphyxiating an explosive lineup and were controlling the game. The ensuing fireworks from Samuels & co, then, wrestled the game back. It was a comeback that didn't look likely but even at the innings break, Sri Lanka's Angelo Mathews opined that the Windies' were 20 runs short. He wasn't fooling anyone, for even Mahela's face etched worry.
The momentum was swinging the way of the Caribbean and the dismissal of Dilshan stifled Sri Lanka's run chase. The West Indies playing in a cauldron of cacophonous, raucous Sri Lankan supporters silenced them at regular intervals. The dark horse had ran the race of her life and left the men in blue to assume bridesmaid duties once more. It was a fine feat and one that reminded me of another great West Indies escape act.
The 2004 Champions Trophy final too, was played between the host nation and the West Indies. After having restricted England to a modest 217 (courtesy of a Trescothick masterclass 104), the Windies themselves were reduced to 147-8. They were staring down the abyss but somehow stitched together an unlikely 71 run partnership between Courtney Browne (34) and Ian Bradshaw (35). (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mz-4rcb8ko8
) The miracle was complete with 7 balls to spare. The old adage 'stealing victory from the jaws of defeat' couldn't be more appropriate and though the manner of victory wasn't as similar as in 2004, one can sense that the situations have parallels. On both occasions, the Windies' had to play against the host nation and had to outmatch a very worthy opponent.
It was then decided that a global tournament would be conducted on the lines of the 50-over World Cup, to ensure global recognition for the format. It was first decided that every two years, an ICC World Twenty20 tournament will take place, except in the event of an ICC 50-over Cricket World Cup scheduled in the same year. Aussies like T20 betting as it makes one of their favourite pastimes even more entertaining. The thrill that comes with a wager is what punters live for. If you’re looking to bet on T20 cricket games, we provide Aussie punters with a list of the best Twenty20 betting sites to choose from down below in our guide to wagering on the sport. Cricket World Cup Betting Odds. View all available outright and match odds, plus get news, tips, free bets and money-back offers. All you need to bet. PGA - The Memorial UFC Fight Island KBO (Stream Live) Italy - Serie A Odds Boosts English Premier League MLS England - Championship. Home / Cricket / ICC World Twenty20 2020 / ICC T20 World Cup 2020. ICC World Twenty20 2020. ICC T20 World Cup 2020. Starts In -:-:-Odds. Futures. New to Sports Betting? Click for some helpful tips before Marizanne Kapp and Dane van Niekerk's big partnership helps South Africa beat England at the Women's T20 World Cup, as the Proteas win with two balls to spare.